Legal Opinion

Duthie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1978No. Civ. 20128PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, Acting P. J.

Petitioner filed a workers’ compensation claim for a heart disability suffered while in the employment of McDonnell Douglas Company. A workers’ compensation judge found that petitioner was permanently disabled and apportioned 25 percent of his disability to his work resulting in a permanent disability rating of 18 percent. On reconsideration, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board determined that petitioner was totally and permanently disabled, apportioning 5 percent of his disability to his work. Petitioner seeks review and annulment of the board’s decision on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. South Coast Framing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Palmeri v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Robinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Ditler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API