Milwaukee Bridge & Iron Works v. Brevoort
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for a mandamus directing respondent to vacate an- order denying motion to quash garnishee proceedings against relator, and to grant the motion. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwood, O. J.
Petitioner is a corporation organized under the laws of Wisconsin, having its principal office in Milwaukee, and having no office or place of business-in this State. One Esson owed Quinn, of Detroit, and on July 27, 1888, Quinn brought suit in the Wayne circuit to recover the debt, and garnished the president of petitioner, who was temporarily in the said county at the time the writ was served.
The affidavit for the writ, in addition to these facts, stated that the affiant had good reason to believe, and *156did believe, that the relator had property, money, goods, credits, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hebel v. Amazon InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Ford v. Detroit Dry Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Iron Cliffs Co. v. LahaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Moore v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Edward Thompson Co. v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
- Wyngarden v. LahuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.