Edward Thompson Co. v. Maynard
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By this appeal in the nature of certiorari the question presented is whether or not the State of Michigan is subject to garnishment process. There is also the question as to whether jurisdiction may be obtained by service of process on the governor and attorney general. Leave having been granted, the State has appealed from a decision in the circuit court holding affirmatively on each of the above questions.
The State being sovereign, suit in its own courts cannot be maintained against it except the sovereign State by its own laws so provides. Aplin, Auditor General, v. Van Tassel,Treasurer of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McDowell v. Warden of Michigan ReformatoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Aplin v. Van TasselMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Milwaukee Bridge & Iron Works v. BrevoortMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Auditor General v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Gaertner v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Bofysil v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- First Fiduciary Corp. v. BlancoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.