Legal Opinion

Ford v. Detroit Dry Dock Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Garnishment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff recovered before a justice a joint judgment against four defendants, and garnished the present defendant. An answer was put in admitting indebtedness in small amounts to a part of the defendants, each individually, but no joint indebtedness to any portion or to all of them. It also relied on their being householders.

In the circuit court, to which the garnishee case was appealed, a-judgment was rendered against the present defendant for the excess of the money due by the garnishee beyond the statutory allowance to each defendant as a householder. Plaintiff brings error, claiming that…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. SchueckIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. W. H. Warner Coal Co. v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Milwaukee Bridge & Iron Works v. BrevoortMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AT & G. CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API