Wilder v. Nicolaus
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The action was brought to quiet title to an irregular piece of land containing about twenty acres. It is described in the complaint and findings by metes and bounds, the southern boundary of which as “the quarter-section line running easterly and westerly through the center of sections 13 and 14, township 5 north, range 5 east, M. D. M.” The strip in question is represented by the colored portion of the following diagram:
The vital controversy in the case is as to the location -of the southern boundary line of plaintiff's land, and the solution of this question depends upon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sneed v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Kahn v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Staniford v. TromblyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Grants Pass Land & Water Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Raab v. CasperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Holzer v. ReadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Agmar v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Phelan v. DrescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.