Legal Opinion
Agmar v. Solomon
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 25, 1927No. Docket No. 6037PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs brought an action in ejectment to recover possession of a lot of land having a frontage of twenty-five feet and six inches on Washington Street, San Francisco. The defendants filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint and by way of cross-complaint defendants Aaron Solomon and Hazel Solomon, his wife, prayed the court for a decree quieting their title to a strip of land four and one-half inches wide by 102 feet in depth, and it is the ownership of this strip of land that is in dispute. The remaining defendants have no interest in the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sullivan v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Johnson v. KillianSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.