Legal Opinion

Moul v. McVey

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1942No. Civ. 11739PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES (B. C.), J. pro tem.

This appeal is from a judgment entered in the trial court against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff, a physician and surgeon, filed a creditor’s claim against the estate of the decedent claiming as due him for professional services rendered the decedent during her lifetime the sum of nine thousand dollars. This claim was rejected by the executor. The plaintiff thereupon instituted this action to recover on the claim and judgment went against him.

The appellant’s specifications of error are directed to various adverse rulings of the trial court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Borgess Investment Co. v. VetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. McClenahan v. KeyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruce v. UlleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Black v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Drvol v. BantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Corso v. Security-First Nat. Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Kay v. KarasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API