State v. Biro
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mary J. Boyle, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Timothy Biro, appeals his conviction of leaving the scene of an accident, in violation of R.C. 4549.02(A), which carried a “furthermore” clause elevating the offense to a third-degree felony as a result of the victim dying. He raises the following six assignment of errors:
{¶ 2} “[I] The trial court erred when it refused to allow the defense to qualify officer Gilbert as an accident [expert] and ask him about his conclusion that the front of Mr. Biro’s vehicle struck the bicycle while it was on the ground and did not strike a person.
{¶ 3} “[II]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ScudderOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.