Legal Opinion

State v. Biro

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 93737Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mary J. Boyle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Timothy Biro, appeals his conviction of leaving the scene of an accident, in violation of R.C. 4549.02(A), which carried a “furthermore” clause elevating the offense to a third-degree felony as a result of the victim dying. He raises the following six assignment of errors:

{¶ 2} “[I] The trial court erred when it refused to allow the defense to qualify officer Gilbert as an accident [expert] and ask him about his conclusion that the front of Mr. Biro’s vehicle struck the bicycle while it was on the ground and did not strike a person.

{¶ 3} “[II]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ScudderOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API