Legal Opinion

State v. Condon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 2003No. Appeal No. C-020262, Trial No. B-0100380(A)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

OPINION.

{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Thomas Condon, appeals from…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Sundermann; Concurrence · Sundermann; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. MassienOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. CondonOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. SuhailCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API