State v. Scudder
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant presents a number of issues for our consideration. (See Appendix, infra.) We have carefully considered appellant’s propositions of law and have reviewed the death sentence for appropriateness and proportionality. Upon review, and for the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.
I
R.C. 2929.05 requires this court to review capital cases in a certain manner. However, the statute does not require that we address and discuss, in opinion form, every proposition of law raised by the parties. State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MasonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Jeffrey Wogenstahl v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court · 1997
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.