Legal Opinion

State v. Saephan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 2003No. 0012-73016; A113023PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Department of Human Services (DHS) on the ground that, because of a mental disorder, he was unable to provide for his basic personal needs. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(B); ORS 426.130(l)(b)(C). On appeal, appellant argues that the record is insufficient to support that finding. On de novo review, State v. Hitt, 179 Or App 563, 565, 41 P3d 434 (2002), we reverse.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Appellant is in his early forties. He is an immigrant from Thailand; English is not his native language. In December 2000, he was detained after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. GjerdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. C. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. PikeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. A. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API