Legal Opinion

State v. M.J.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 2011No. M1002003; A145031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Appellant appeals from a judgment of involuntary civil commitment, contending that the record is insufficient to support the trial court’s determination that, as a result of his mental disorder, he was unable to provide for his basic personal needs and was not receiving such care as is necessary for health or safety. ORS 426.005; ORS 426.070; ORS 426.130. The state argues that the trial court properly committed appellant. We conclude that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court’s determination that appellant was unable to provide for his basic needs. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. K. R. C. v. Three Affiliated TribesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. A. M.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. MJCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API