Legal Opinion
Margeson v. Boston & Maine Railroad
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 13, 1954No. Civ. A No. 53-1088-APublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
This is an action for personal injury brought by an employee of the defendant. The plaintiff has filed a motion under Rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A., to require the defendant to produce voluminous statements, records and other documents, including his own statement, and has had a motion allowed to stay the defendant's taking of his deposition until the principal motion has been heard. Counsel’s affidavit accompanying the motion purporting to show cause is prolix and repetitious, and contains considerable matter which, on analysis, the affiant could not have been competent to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Leonard v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Cleary Brothers v. Christie Scow CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- Cox v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1965
- Smith v. Central Linen Service Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Buining v. The S.S. TransporterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Currie v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.