Legal Opinion
Smith v. Central Linen Service Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 10, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 14814PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s objections to two interrogatories propounded by plaintiff in this personal injury diversity case have been referred to the Court for decision under Local Rule 7, which permits a decision on the papers and memoranda without hearing. The complaint alleges that the injury occurred on February 22,1961. The suit was filed on July 5, 1963. The interrogatories were filed on September 24, 1965.
I. The first interrogatory objected to is 5(b). It was posed in the following context: Interrogatory 5 first inquired whether plaintiff had given defendant, or any person acting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- The New York Central Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Alva O. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Knighton v. Villian & Fassio e Compagnia Internazionale di Genova Societe Riuniti di NavigazioneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Parla v. Matson Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rofail v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. ProjanskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Fernandes v. United Fruit Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Hikel v. AbousyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Torres-Paulett v. Tradition Mariner, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.