Buining v. The S.S. Transporter
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Libellant has filed a motion under Admiralty Rule 32, 28 U.S.C.A. (which is similar to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A.) to require respondents S. S. Transporter and Sea Freighter Corporation, S. A., to produce for inspection and copying by libellant certain documents, papers, etc., alleging that their production is necessary: (a) to enable libellant to properly prepare and present his case; (b) to expedite the trial; (c) to preserve the time of this Court and jury; (d) to narrow the issues.
The documents sought are:
1. A report of the master, made in the ordinary course of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Helverson v. J. J. Newberry Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Central Linen Service Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1966
- Hanson v. Gartland Steamship Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Hall v. HagueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1964
- Caruso v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1961
- Norris Manufacturing Co. v. R. E. Darling Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.