Currie v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
This motion for production, the second in the case, raises a matter of general import. The question of what constitutes cause within Rule 34, F.R. Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A., is often difficult, but it seems to me that there are certain somewhat standard situations which may carry their own showing of cause, if cause is to be construed as requiring, in addition to relevance, more-or-less uniqueness of source, and need outweighing any countervailing policy reasons for delaying discovery. Cf. Margeson v. Boston & Maine R. R., D.C.D.Mass., 16 F.R.D. 200. For example, a plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- Margeson v. Boston & Maine RailroadDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- Roberson v. Graham Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Puerto Rico Electric Power AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- United States v. 23.76 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Leszynski v. RussDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Smith v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.