Legal Opinion

Cox v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 16, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 4744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Motion for Production and Entry Upon Property, pursuant to Rule 34,1 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeks favorable decision of the Court:

To permit entry upon the duPont Brevard Plant, Polyester Building, Brevard, North Carolina, for the purpose of inspecting, measuring and photographing the property and the treatment coater machine contained therein, including controls, instruments and all related functions.

A supporting affidavit of plaintiff’s counsel, Wesley M. Walker, Esquire, avers:

[T]hat the defendant, E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company, is in possession and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Margeson v. Boston & Maine RailroadDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  5. Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API