Legal Opinion

Stone v. Orth Chevrolet Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This action was brought by an assignee for the benefit of creditors and, by amendment, is now prose-*526outed by a trustee in bankruptcy of the Arlington Automobile Company. The declaration, upon an account annexed, sets out three hundred twenty-eight items of indebtedness arising between April 29 and October 1, 1930, totalling $6,047.05, and nineteen items of credit arising between May 30 and July 30, 1930, totalling $3,338.77. The answer is general denial and payment, and, by amendment, set-off upon a promissory note for $2,500 payable to one Huntington, which was alleged to have been purchased…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Spurr v. Inhabitants of ShelburneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. Hill v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Newell v. RosenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Florence Machine Co. v. DaggettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Cozzo v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Steele v. KelleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Newton Construction Co. v. West & South Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Copithorn v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API