Legal Opinion

Steele v. Kelley

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 12, 1999No. 97-P-1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laurence, J. A.

Procedural background. On June 15, 1994, Walter E. Steele commenced the underlying suit, in his capacity as a beneficiary of the Chatham’s Comer Tmst (CCT), against Gerald E Kelley, both individually and in his capacity as sole trustee of the CCT. The sole asset of the CCT was a parcel of rentable commercial real estate in downtown Boston (premises), which was registered land. Steele alleged (in an unverified amended complaint) that, as CCT trustee, Kelley had, since late 1992, refused to give the other beneficiaries an accounting, despite their demands; had mortgaged trust…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cavicchi v. KoskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Grand Pacific Finance Corp. v. BrauerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  3. Lattuca v. RobshamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Greenleaf Arms Realty Trust I, LLC v. New Boston Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  5. Ray-Tek Services, Inc. v. ParkerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API