Legal Opinion

Newell v. Rosenberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 26, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

These actions were tried together. The case of Newell against Rosenberg and Nesson, .begun by *457writ dated June 19, 1930, is an action of contract to recover upon three promissory notes given to the plaintiff by the defendants as part of the consideration for the assignment of a contract for the purchase of land in Florida sold through the plaintiff’s agents. Each note contained a promise to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee. The answer is a general denial, payment, denial of genuineness of the signatures, failure and partial failure of consideration for the notes, that the defendants were…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Burke v. HodgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Brocklehurst & Potter Co. v. MarschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Minot v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Fondi v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Perley v. PerleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Enga v. SparksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Spencer v. BurakiewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Wrede v. Exchange Bank of GibbonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Burgess v. GiovannucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API