Legal Opinion

Hardin v. Sutherland

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1930No. Docket No. 226PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMES, J., pro tem.

This is an action for personal injury and property damage. On the fifth day of July, 1926, at the hour of about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, appellant was riding in an automobile belonging to the Los Angeles Building Trades Council, and which was being driven by her husband, Collins Hardin, in a northerly direction on a public highway between TiaJuana, Mexico, and the city of San Diego, in San Diego County. The respondent was engaged in operating a line of motor-stages between the city of San Diego and TiaJuana. While the Dodge car, in which appellant was riding, was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Shimoda v. BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Wohlenberg v. MalcewiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Elford v. HiltabrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Day v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API