United States v. Birdsong
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RUSSELL, Judge:
A general court-martial, consisting of officer and enlisted members, convicted the appellant, contrary to her pleas, of larceny and forgery (three specifications) in violation of Articles 121 and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 923 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence consisting of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for one year, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E1.
This case is before the court for initial review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. SteinruckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. MundyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JenkinsArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. LanierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. JacksonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999