Bartell v. Luedtke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether it was an abuse of discretion for the trial judge to order a new trial in the interest of justice.
It is well settled that in cases where the trial court has awarded a new trial in the interest of justice, this court will affirm unless there is a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Van Gheem v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. (1967), 33 Wis. 2d 231, 147 N. W. 2d 237. The determination of whether discretion was abused by the trial court is guided by a number of elementary principles which were stated in Hillstead v. Shaw (1967), 34 Wis. 2d 643, 150 N. W. 2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Vogel v. VettingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Dahl v. K-MARTWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Voigt v. VoigtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Krolikowski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Jahnke v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Weber v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.