Jahnke v. Smith
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Heffernan,. J.
An order of a trial court granting a new trial in the interest of justice will ordinarily be affirmed unless there is a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Bartell v. Luedtke (1971), 52 Wis. 2d 372, 377, 190 N. W. 2d 145; Van Gheem v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. (1967), 33 Wis. 2d 231, 236, 147 N. W. 2d 237. In discussing the review of an order for a new trial, this court stated in Loomans v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins Co. (1968), 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N. W. 2d 318:
“The review of an order which rests on legal discretion is limited to abuse and this court will look for reasons to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Orwick v. BelshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.