Legal Opinion

Jahnke v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1973No. 146PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Heffernan,. J.

An order of a trial court granting a new trial in the interest of justice will ordinarily be affirmed unless there is a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Bartell v. Luedtke (1971), 52 Wis. 2d 372, 377, 190 N. W. 2d 145; Van Gheem v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. (1967), 33 Wis. 2d 231, 236, 147 N. W. 2d 237. In discussing the review of an order for a new trial, this court stated in Loomans v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins Co. (1968), 38 Wis. 2d 656, 662, 158 N. W. 2d 318:

“The review of an order which rests on legal discretion is limited to abuse and this court will look for reasons to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Sell v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snover v. McGrawIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Orwick v. BelshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API