Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Vetting

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1953PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeoadfoot, J.

Each driver was injured in the collision. They were taken to the same hospital in the same ambulance and treated by the same doctor, who testified that each, because of injuries, suffered a retrograde amnesia. Each driver was alone. The plaintiff Mary Vogel could remember nothing that happened after passing a farm some distance west of the intersection and Vetting could remember nothing after he passed a certain driveway, known as the Lensmeyer driveway, which was some 550 feet south of the intersection. Mrs. Vogel could testify to nothing that would aid in explaining the cause of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. KujathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Reynolds v. Madison Bus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lozon v. Leamon Bakery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hamm v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Himebauch v. LudtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Coughran v. HickoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kraskey v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Atkinson v. HuberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API