Legal Opinion

Hillstead v. Shaw

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

A single issue is presented by this appeal:

Did the trial court abuse its discretion by ordering a new trial in the interest of justice?

The trial court ordered a new trial in the interest of justice pursuant to sec. 270.49, Stats. Our court will sustain such an order unless there is a showing of abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. It is elementary that in such cases the supreme court does not look for evidence to sustain the jury’s findings, but seeks reasons for sustaining the trial court. Essentially, the supreme court usually defers to the trial court’s decision because of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Statz v. PohlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Callahan v. Van GalderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Huebner v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Orwick v. BelshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bartell v. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Seif v. TurowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API