Legal Opinion

Kohler v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 27, 1989No. C6-88-2384PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Based on a remainder interest in a trust, appellants Louise F. Kohler and Edward J. Kohler sought tort damages for breach of trustees’ fiduciary duty, loss of consortium, and punitive damages assertedly flowing therefrom. The trial court granted summary judgment to respondents Fremont Fletcher and First National Bank based on exclusivity of equitable remedies and on the derivative nature of claims for loss of consortium and punitive damages. We affirm.

FACTS

Abbott and Louise Fletcher, husband and wife, had three children: Joanne Fletcher Susag, Alfred Fletcher, and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jo Ann Howard and Associates v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1994
  4. R.E.R. v. J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API