Legal Opinion
In Re Computer Sciences Corp. Erisa Litigation
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 13, 2009No. CV 08-02398 SJO (JWJx), CV 08-02409 SJO (JWJx)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket Nos. 108,130],
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Federico Quan, Walter Gray, Don Tyrone Ballard and Jeanine L. Shamaljds (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, filed May 8, 2009, and Defendants Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”) 1 , CSC Retirement Plans Committee (the “Committee”), Leon J. Level, Hayward D. Fisk, Frederick E. Vollrath, Donald G. DeBuck, Michael E. Keane, and Nathan…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Paul Saumer v. Cliffs Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Carr v. International Game TechnologyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.