Legal Opinion

Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2013No. 10-56014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, current and former employees of Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) and its subsidiary Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (“AML”), participated in two employer-sponsored pension plans, the Amgen Retirement and Savings Plan (the “Amgen Plan”) and the Retirement and Savings Plan for Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (the “AML Plan”) (collectively, “the Plans”). The Plans were employee stock-ownership plans that qualified as “eligible individual account plans” (“EIAPs”) under 29 U.S.C. § 1107(d)(3)(A). All of the plaintiffs’ EIAPs included holdings in the Amgen Common Stock…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rinehart v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. In re Lehman Bros. ERISA Litig.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Lopez v. Nutex Health IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  4. Topolski v. Washington State Department of LicensingDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. Vasquez v. Washington Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API