Legal Opinion
Carr v. International Game Technology
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 16, 2011No. 2:09-cv-00584PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order
EDWARD C. REED, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are former employee participants in International Game Technology’s (“IGT”) profit sharing plan (“Plan”) who have brought a class action suit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 to allege breach of fiduciary duty claims under Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(2). The parties have argued the merits of the motions to be considered by the Court at the hearing on March 10, 2011. The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition and reply documents, along with the parties’…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rinehart v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Acosta v. SaakvitneDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- Monper v. Boeing Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Moon v. BWX Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- (PS) Nible v. MacomberDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.