Legal Opinion
Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2014No. 10-56014PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, current and former employees of Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) and its subsidiary Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (“AML”), participated in two employer-sponsored pension plans, the Amgen Retirement and Savings. Plan (the “Amgen Plan”) and the Retirement and Savings Plan for Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (the “AML Plan”) (collectively, “the Plans”). The Plans were employee stock-ownership plans that qualified as “eligible individual account plans” (“EIAPs”) under 29 U.S.C. § 1107(d)(3)(A). All of the plaintiffs’ EIAPs included holdings in the Amgen Common Stock…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sidney Hillman Health Center o v. Abbott Laboratories, IncorporaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Jander v. Ret. Plans Comm. IbmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- In re Lehman Bros. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Harris v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gedek v. PerezDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.