Legal Opinion

Stuesser v. Ebel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The first question is whether the contract is so indefinite as to be void under the statute of frauds. The contract dated March 30, 1960, described the property as “the real estate owned by the Sellers and located in the Town of Oak Grove, now known as the ‘Dobie Inn’ and used in the business of the Sellers.” The purchase price was $15,000 of which $3,000 was paid down. The defendants lived in the tavern which also carried a sideline of groceries. The building was situated on lots 6 and 7 in the village of Dobie in the town of Oak Grove in Barron county. The building was located on the east…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brandeis v. NeustadtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Inglis v. FoheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Harney v. BurhansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Arjay Investment Co. v. KohlmetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kuester v. RowlandsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. GissalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Zapuchlak v. HucalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ochiltree v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wadsworth v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API