Legal Opinion

Denison Mutual Telephone Co. v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1965No. 44,129PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This is an appeal instituted on behalf of the Denison Mutual Telephone Company and the Mayetta Mutual Telephone Company by and through their respective presidents, Wilbur T. Martin and Charles Renfro, Jr., plaintiffs (appellants), seeking equitable rescission of written contracts for the sale of the companies on the ground of alleged false representations made by Howard Kendall, defendant (appellee), in the purchase of the property.

Roth actions were consolidated and tried to the district court. The court made findings of fact and conclusions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. International Motor Rebuilding Co. v. United Motor Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. City of Parsons v. Parsons Water Supply & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Fine v. Neale Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Kansas Power & Light Co. v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Atkin, Wright & Miles, CharteredUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United Trust Co. v. PykeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Grindsted Products, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API