Legal Opinion

Fine v. Neale Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1960No. 41,234PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The plaintiff, Howard B. Fine, brought two actions— one against the Telephone & Power Supply Co., and the other against the Neale Construction Co., Inc., to recover certain salary and expense money. The actions were consolidated and tried together in the trial court, and in each case judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Each of the defendants appealed, and in the first-mentioned case the judgment was affirmed in Fine v. Telephone & Power Supply Co., 185 Kan. 383, 345 P. 2d 616.

This appeal is by the defendant, Neale Construction Co., Inc.

It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. First Presbyterian Church v. HammelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Fine v. Telephone & Power Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United Trust Co. v. PykeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Khalil-Alsalaami v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  5. Hindman v. ShepardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API