Legal Opinion
Grindsted Products, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided August 4, 1995No. 72,456PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, C.J.:
Grindsted Products, Inc., (Grindsted) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Grindsted argues that a claim for damages under K.S.A. 66-176 need not be first determined by the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC). We affirm the district court’s order dismissing Grindsted’s action.
The facts are largely undisputed on appeal. Grindsted manufactures bulk food products. Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCP&L) provides electricity to Grindsted’s manufacturing plant in Johnson County, Kansas. KCP&L charges Grindsted for service *436pursua…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Kearney v. Kansas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Dietz v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Beadle v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hayes Sight & Sound, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Jp Morgan Trust Co. Nat. v. Mid-America PipelineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Nora H. Ringler Revocable Family Trust v. Meyer Land and Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- Grindsted Products, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- United Cities Gas Co. v. Brock Exploration Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.