Legal Opinion

Faeber v. ECT CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 25, 1972No. 7212SC675PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant submits that the questions raised in its three assignments of error are included in its contention that “the court erred in its failure and refusal to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant in apt time to give instructions to the jury as specially prayed for as to the meaning of the terms ‘legal justification,’ ‘sufficient cause’ and ‘wrongful discharge.’ ”

It is the duty of the trial court to charge the law applicable to the substantive features of the case arising on the evidence, without special requests, and to apply the law to the various factual situations…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Bass Ex Rel. Bass v. HocuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Hagan v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Millis Construction Co. v. Fairfield Sapphire Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Maglione v. Aegis Family Health CentersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Liborio v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Walker v. TOWN OF STONEVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API