Legal Opinion

Baker v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1951No. Civ. 7887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and respondent commenced an action to recover a broker’s commission of $2,500 on the sale of a 1,080-acre ranch in Mariposa County. The jury’s verdict was in favor of plaintiff and this appeal is from the judgment entered on such verdict.

In arguing for a reversal of the judgment defendant and appellant makes two main contentions: 1. That at the time of the sale there was no valid contract between the parties ; and, 2. That the court erred in its instructions to the jury.

We shall first summarize briefly the factual situation as disclosed by the record, bearing in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Rose v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API