Baker v. Curtis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff and respondent commenced an action to recover a broker’s commission of $2,500 on the sale of a 1,080-acre ranch in Mariposa County. The jury’s verdict was in favor of plaintiff and this appeal is from the judgment entered on such verdict.
In arguing for a reversal of the judgment defendant and appellant makes two main contentions: 1. That at the time of the sale there was no valid contract between the parties ; and, 2. That the court erred in its instructions to the jury.
We shall first summarize briefly the factual situation as disclosed by the record, bearing in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rose v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.