Legal Opinion

Harder Et Ux. v. City of Springfield

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment. It is brought by the plaintiffs, James Harder and his wife, Ada Harder, who are owners of and residents upon real property situated on North Tenth street in the city of Springfield, Oregon, lying within the boundaries of an area determined to be benefited by a projected paving improvement of that street. The contested improvement was initiated by the Common Council and by it authorized and directed on the 29th day of August, 1949, under its Ordinance No. 986. The defendants are the city of Springfield, a municipal corporation, and its several…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Allen v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Binhoff v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Gabriel Powder & Supply Co. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Ramirez v. Hawaii T & S Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Advocates for Effective Regulation v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Portland Police Ass'n v. Civil Service BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API