Legal Opinion

Rao v. Rao

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 1983No. Nos. 82-1954, 82-1971PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.

The primary issue in this diversity case is whether, under Illinois law, an employer may dismiss an employee without good cause and in bad faith and then enforce a restrictive covenant severely limiting the scope of the employee’s professional practice. The secondary issue is whether an employee, who asserts that he is owed money under an employment contract, may circumvent the contract’s arbitration clause by framing his claim as one sounding in tort. We resolve each issue in the negative; the restrictive covenant is unenforceable and the employee must take his claim…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Foster Enterprises, Inc. v. Germania Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Cockerill v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wessel Co. v. BusaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Image Supplies, Inc. v. HilmertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Criscione v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Valley Liquors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. James S. Jordan, Cross-Appellee v. Duff and Phelps, Inc., Claire v. Hansen, and Francis E. Jeffries, Defendants- Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Ronald Pribyl, James Harvey, Thomas Skrtic, and Accu-Tech Plastics, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Frank Lascola v. Us Sprint CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API