Legal Opinion

Cockcroft v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1936No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiff is the beneficiary named in four policies of insurance issued by the defendant company on the life of her husband. Upon the death of the insured, on February 16, 1935, the defendant paid the plaintiff the face amount of the policies. Plaintiff brought this suit to recover under a rider attached or applicable to each of the policies allowing double indemnity if the insured died under the conditions therein set forth. The case was tried in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County before a judge without a jury. The trial court made a finding in plaintiff’s favor,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Insurance Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Boles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Flaccus v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. General Mills, Inc. v. SnavelySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Hower v. Whitmak AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Norwood v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API