Marshall v. State Ex Rel. Cooney
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶ 1 Plaintiffs challenge the constitutional validity of Constitutional Initiative 75 (CI-75) in an original application for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief.
¶2 We hold that CI-75 violates Article XIV, Section 11, of Montana’s Constitution.
¶3 We address the following issue:
¶4 Whether CI-75 violates the separate-vote provision in Article XIV, Section 11, of the Montana Constitution.
*277Factual and Procedural Background
¶5 On November 3, 1998 Montana voters approved CI-75. As enacted, CI-75 amended Article VIII of the Montana Constitution by adding a new Section 17 that began:
Section 17.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Sawyer Stores, Inc. v. MitchellMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Hinz v. MoodyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Cambria v. SoariesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Arizona Together v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.