Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State Ex Rel. Cooney

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1999No. 98-706PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶ 1 Plaintiffs challenge the constitutional validity of Constitutional Initiative 75 (CI-75) in an original application for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief.

¶2 We hold that CI-75 violates Article XIV, Section 11, of Montana’s Constitution.

¶3 We address the following issue:

¶4 Whether CI-75 violates the separate-vote provision in Article XIV, Section 11, of the Montana Constitution.

*277Factual and Procedural Background

¶5 On November 3, 1998 Montana voters approved CI-75. As enacted, CI-75 amended Article VIII of the Montana Constitution by adding a new Section 17 that began:

Section 17.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Corry v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Sawyer Stores, Inc. v. MitchellMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Hinz v. MoodyMontana Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Californians for an Open Primary v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cambria v. SoariesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Arizona Together v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API