Legal Opinion

Renfro v. City of Emporia, Kan.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 5, 1990No. Civ. A. 87-4038-SPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability. Defendant has also moved for leave to file certain original depositions and exhibits thereto with the court. Upon examination of defendant’s motion for leave to file these depositions, the court finds that such filing is not necessary to its decision in this matter; accordingly, defendant’s request is denied. D.Kan. 210(g).

Plaintiffs, who are or were employed with the City of Emporia,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Renfro v. City of Emporia, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  3. Renfro v. City of EmporiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Renfro v. City of Emporia, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Truslow v. Spotsylvania County SheriffDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API