Legal Opinion
Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper Workers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1992No. 91-35409PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from a labor dispute between Defendant employer ITT-Rayonier, Inc. and 91 employees who had brought an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 216. The principal issue is whether the FLSA requires overtime compensation for the hours Plaintiffs were required to be available by telephone for “on-call” activities. We hold that under the facts of this case, Plaintiffs are not entitled to overtime compensation for that time. We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs and remand…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Keun-Jae Moon v. Joon Gab KwonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lyle G. Armitage, Jr. v. City of Emporia, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Charlene Brigham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Brigham Carl Hall Gary Millsap Donald E. Reed v. Eugene Water & Electric BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Arnold J. Owens v. Local No. 169, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, Third-Party-Defendant v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.