Legal Opinion

Crump v. Pitchford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 7, 1902No. 123PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Craig County Court; Thos. I). B. Frear, Judge. Action between Walter Crump and another and A. J. Pitch-ford. From the judgment Walter Crump and such other bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilijaMS, J.

The question raised in the first assignment of error is that the county court, at the time this action was commenced, to wit, on the 24th 'day of July, 1908, had no jurisdiction of a forcible entry and detainer action. Section 12, art. 7, Const. (Bunn’s Ed. § 182), provides that:

“The county court, coextensive with the county, shall have original jurisdiction in all probate matters, and until otherwise provided by law, shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the district court in civil cases in any amount not exceeding one thousand dollars, exclusive of interest: Provided, that the county…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. McClung v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ozark Oil Co. v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Rust v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Northcutt v. BastableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Tate v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API