Legal Opinion

Rust v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1923No. 11076PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON, j:

Plaintiffs in error filed tHis suit in the district cóurt of Payne county December 30, 1916, but it was not prosecuted to judgment until October,- Í919. The object of the suit was the cancellation of an administratrix’s deed, conveying a certain tract of land to which Tí. Rust, deceased husband of administratrix.- ’had . title, to one Jess Bell, and also the cancellation of a warranty deed from said Jess Bell to the defendant in error, George T, Gillespie..

The facts, more fully stated, are as follows :

Jess Bell was the father of the adminis-tratrix and father-in-law of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bartle v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Parks v. LefeberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. In Re Kelly's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. McDonald v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Camp v. CampSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API