Love v. Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The defendants in error were plaintiffs and the plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court. They will be referred to herein as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared below.
Plaintiffs’ suit was for the purpose of quieting title to an undivided interest in an oil and gas lease on certain lands in the oil fields adjacent to Oklahoma City. The petition makes the usual allegations and seeks the usual relief of such actions. The defendant filed her answer and cross-petition. In her answer and cross-petition defendant admits that plaintiffs are the record owners of an undivided interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Lewis B. Wood Realty Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Ramsay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Sipes v. PerdomoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Horton v. FielderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. DrabekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Diamond Sevens, L.L.C. v. Intelligent Home Automation, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010