Legal Opinion

Wilder Bros. v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 8, 1935No. 24348PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. A mortgagor may interpose to the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage any defense which he could make in an ordinary suit on the demand secured by the mortgage. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3289, 3300 (Code of 1933, §§ 67-1004, 801).

2. After the plaintiff had instituted proceedings to foreclose a chattel mortgage on certain live stock to secure a debt of $500 due by the defendants to him, he met with them at the office of his attorney, and there a valuation of $100 was placed upon the live stock levied on under the mortgage fi. fa., and the plaintiff agreed with the defendants that if they would pay…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brunswick & Western Railway Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Long v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Molyneaux v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. Blalock v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Stovall v. HairstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Mortgage Purchase & Sales Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Lyle v. Mandeville MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. Rural Electric Appliance Co. v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API