Lyle v. Mandeville Mills
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. We will deal first with the question whether the allegations of the answer with reference to the statement of the attorney of plaintiff to the defendant, the promise alleged and the reliance of the defendant thereon, constituted a valid defense as against the suit on the notes. We do not think so for, (a) there was no consideration for the extension; (b) the promise was too indefinite; (c) the allegations are not sufficient to set out fraud as a defense; (d) it is alleged that after defendant left home for work he wrote the attorney, received no reply,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCrary v. WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Blackshear Manufacturing Co. v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Wilder Bros. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Langston & Co. v. Neely Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Employees Loan & Thrift Corp. v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Epps v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974