Legal Opinion

Mortgage Purchase & Sales Co. v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 1936No. 25574PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

“An agreement by a creditor to receive less than the amount of his debt can not be pleaded as an accord and satisfaction, unless it be actually executed by the payment of the money, or the giving of additional security, or the substitution of another debtor, or some other new consideration.” Code, § 20-1204. “The accord and satisfaction must be of some advantage, legal or equitable to the creditor.” § 20-1203. In the absence of a bona fide dispute, mere surrender by the debtor of money already paid or property already admittedly belonging to the creditor, where no advantage or benefit accrues…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Burgamy v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Dykes v. McVaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. Carswell v. HartidgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibson v. FILTER QUEEN COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Taylor v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Casper National Bank v. WoodinWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Merritt v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Pope v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API