Long v. Scanlan
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint for damages. Before Judge Janes. Polk superior court. August term, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
1. The defendant in the court below lost his case there, and made a motion for a new trial. This motion con*425tained several grounds which, were approved by the trial judge. Subsequently, many additional grounds were added by way of' amendment to the original motion. These grounds were not approved, either expressly or by implication. They had written upon them only the word “ allowed,” and whether that was written by the judge or by counsel does not appear. This entry upon them meant, in our opinion, nothing more than that counsel’s request to file additional grounds as an amendment was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Brunswick & Western Railway Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Russell v. LytleNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Skinner v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Ballard v. NoaksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1839
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hoffman v. Franklin Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Fouché & Fouché v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Dannelly v. Cuthbert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- J. Kuniansky Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Fletcher v. GillespieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.